How many emails does it take to change a biofuels policy?
2 October 2008
... About 35,000. Or at least that's how many it took to help trigger the other week's biofuels vote victory. But before we go into that, some history.
Earlier this year Oxfam started campaigning against the use of biofuels. Made from crops like maize and wheat, biofuels were previously considered to be 'green'. But it's now known that biofuels are doing far more harm than good.
So as you can imagine, we were less-than-impressed when the European Union started suggesting it was going to introduce targets to make it compulsory for biofuels to be blended with petrol and diesel.
Action was needed. So we decided the best plan of attack was to target the MEPs (the people that represent us at the European Parliament) who were set to vote on the biofuel legislation at the EU.
35,000 emails were sent by Oxfam supporters from 19 different countries, meaning that for the last two weeks, MEPs were starting work with jammed inboxes. Though this was probably annoying for the MEPs who had to wade through a long list of emails, sometimes you have to annoy to make a point. And as the biofuel vote was ultimately one that will affect people's lives, this was a point that needed making.
The MEPs got the message. After two weeks of intense emailing the results were:
- The original target of biofuels providing 10 per cent of transport fuel has been reduced to 6 per cent
- Standards and safeguards should be introduced to help protect people in poor countries and reduce the impact of biofuels on food prices
- A strong review clause - which would potentially allow the target to be scrapped in 2014
We think this is important progress. And while we're not quite ready to crack open a big bottle of victory Champagne (ideally biofuels would be scrapped altogether), it's a step in the right direction.
The next stage is making sure the MEP's recommendations aren't watered down, and we'll be letting you know how you can keep the pressure on - the best way to keep up-to-date is by subscribing to our monthly email newsletter.
In the mean time, it's an opportunity for all of you who took the online action to feel rather chuffed that you helped change the direction of policy without even leaving your desk.
Updates by email
Get regular campaigning updates and actions direct to your inbox.

Campaigns news
Get the inside story on the latest campaigning developments.
How many emails does it take to change a biofuels policy?
2 October 2008
Keeping the pressure on in New York
26 September 2008
In my name: calling for action at the UN
25 September 2008
Breakdancing mums headspin for decent healthcare
24 September 2008

Comments
Hi Roger,
The detail was in the small print. The MEPs you, and everyone else, emailed were targetted because they were all members of Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, and so they might not have been your MEP per se.
The letter that you'll have sent when you completed the online action went into detail on this and explained that we weren't contacting MEPs about consituent issues.
Richard, Oxfam GB | October 6, 2008 11:56 AM
La humanidad siempre em primer lugar.
No destruan la humanidad que tenemos.
Antonio da Silva Ortega | October 4, 2008 5:37 PM
The growing of biofuels is a con. It competes for arable land and so pushes up food prices, and it's the poor who are deprived of food.
ken kirk | October 3, 2008 7:34 PM
Thanks for the feedback and news of some progress. Good news indeed. I noted however that when I responded to the call to post an email there was no indication given that it would be sent specifically to my MEP. I can understand the annoyance of MEPs if they are blitzed with emails from far and wide rather than just their own contituents.
Roger Hand | October 3, 2008 5:02 PM