Bonkers bio-fuels law launched today

15 April 2008

So it's official. Starting today, thanks to some quite frankly daft work by the UK Government, a new law has come into place meaning that each time we visit the petrol station; we're all going to have no choice but to fill our cars with fuel that contains crops that are harming poor people.

"Eh?", you might ask yourself.

What's happened is that new legislation means fuel suppliers must meet targets for blending bio-fuels with petrol and diesel.

Made from plant products, bio-fuels have been championed for their potential to help tackle climate change.

But there's mounting evidence that bio-fuels are deepening poverty - poor people are being pushed off their land, are subjected to labour exploitation, and face spiralling food prices.

For the last few months, supporters of CAFOD, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, RSPB and Oxfam have all joined forces to demand that Ruth Kelly (the government minister responsible for overseeing the whole charade) sorts things out by introducing proper sustainability standards for bio-fuel production.

Almost 10,000 supporters across the coalition emailed or wrote to Ruth Kelly to ask her that this new law is postponed, but despite this the Government has still ploughed ahead. So, as we're sure you can imagine, with the laws coming into effect today, we're not particularly impressed.

In an attempt to get the Government to see sense, campaigners headed down to the Houses of Parliament yesterday.

They were featured on Channel 4 news last night in a report which detailed that even the Government's own research has found that if bio-fuel production increases in Columbia it may well lead to "forced evictions, land grabs, pollution and destruction of forests".

Thanks to some jiggery pokery, we've managed to import the clip from the Channel 4 website into our blog. Though if you've read this far in this article you'll already know the news isn't good, it's still worth a watch just to see some campaigners dressed up as giant ears of corn.











Comments:

I think its taking away peoples freedom of choice by having biofuel in both petrol and diesel. There should be normal petrol/diesel and biofuel petrol/diesel. Untill that happens i think people should BOYCOTT FUEL ALTOGETHER!!

Also i think people have a right to know where all products come from and what effect making this product has had on people and the enviroment.

And i think laws should be put in place to ensure this happens- companies should have to produce information about there products because at the end of the day all most companies care about is profit!

Anonymous | June 8, 2008 5:19 PM

Please tell our governmment that food for the poor must take preference over filling up gas-guzzler's fuel tanks, and we should fight climate change by motoring less

Jenny Gibson | May 1, 2008 9:43 PM

It is a positive step.it will help the third world countries to change their mind set to stop the propaganda of biofuel cultivations.

jankirampanda | April 28, 2008 2:45 AM

With rising cereal prices worldwide adding to global poverty, surely the object should be to use sustainable and renewable energy sources that do not have a negative effect on food resources. How short sighted!!

Matthew Grudgings | April 22, 2008 10:13 AM

This is a disgrace. I am so glad Oxfam our campaigning on this issue.

Barry Cade | April 15, 2008 6:35 PM

Add comment:

Please note that this is a moderated comments system. Your comment will be checked by a moderator prior to publication. We do not guarantee that comments will be published.

Name:


Email address (this will not be made public):



Comment:


bio fuel    CAFOD    climate change    Friends of the Earth    Greenpeace    law    legislation    RSPB    UK Government   
Campaign news

Campaigns news

Get the inside story on the latest campaigning developments.

Oxfam supporters call for aid promises to be kept
20 April 2009

Carteret Islands sunk by climate change
17 April 2009

Global aid figures show a lack of commitment
9 April 2009

More big meetings, more disappointing climate mumblings
7 April 2009