As Ian Davenport has observed, Process is a tool, it's not the point of the paintings. The point is the richness of the final outcome which is intertwined with a set of procedures. In these new paintings household paint is poured from an everyday container, such as a watering can, directly onto a panel creating a round shape that Davenport has described as a big flat pancake. The panel is then flipped over to allow the excess paint to drip on to the floor. This creates the first of several layers of colour that give these works their rich density and subtle structure. The process of layering, and the thickness of the gloss paint, allow these works to read as shallow reliefs, bringing home the truth of the artist's recent admission, I've never really thought of myself as a painter, more as a sculptor who makes paintings.
Although these paintings are rooted in an abstract aesthetic, they are very much the product of contemporary city life. Davenport has described the importance to him of commercially available colours that he sees on a day to day basis: the glossy surfaces of cars, for example, or the gaudy decor of a local kebab shop, or the flat acid colours of television cartoons such as The Simpsons. It's got a lot to do with the things you look at and pick up on when you're just walking around London: the bright signs, advertising, a section of corrugated iron. Ideas emerge from these things.
The immediate impact on the eye made by these paintings conceals the length of time they take to be completed. Given the nature of the thick glossy medium, each layer of paint may need around two or three months to dry, which means that a single painting could take up to two years before Davenport is satisfied that it is finished. It is a process that suits an artist who says he is looking for something that is both immediate and prolonged.